![]()
Title
Art
Overall |
The Books of MagicIt's a difficult thing to put a finger on, but there's something about this book that we really don't like. Don't get us wrong - the book is an expertly crafted story, showcasing many aspects of the Gaiman imagination. The art is great, perfectly demonstrating the skills of the four artists involved. And the characters are a whole bunch of DC's back catalogue from throughout the ages. In fact, that's exactly why we don't like it. It feels like a corporate showcase.![]() ![]() There's no denying there's something of the Harry Potter about this, with Tim's bespectacled appearance, though this is no chicken and egg situation. Gaiman certainly beat Rowling to the young magician concept. Having religiously avoided Potter and his pals, your writer can't really comment any further on this (well, he could, but he refuses) though there's plenty of people out there who will. So, in a nutshell, we weren't overly impressed. We know Gaiman has done better and it doesn't particularly surprise us that he left his young wizard creation for others to pick up. We also don't think the artists, with a quarter of a story each, had enough to sink their teeth into. It's not a bad book, but it feels like there's been a corporate polish to it somehow, which leaves us feeling a little cold. |
Published by Warner Books First published 1993 Originally published as The Books of Magic 1-4 ISBN 1-56389-082-8 Links Annotations Next in series The Books of Magic: Bindings |